హోం  »  కంపెనీ  »  Aastha Broadcasting  »  వ్యాఖ్యలు  »  అకౌంట్స్ గమనికలు
కంపెనీ యొక్క మొదటి కొన్ని అక్షరాలు నమోదు చేసి క్లిక్ చేయండి, 'వెళ్లు'

అకౌంట్స్ గమనికలుAastha Broadcasting Network Ltd.

Mar 31, 2014

1. The Company is following corporate accounting year to close the accounts on 31st March every year.

2. Contingent Liability not provided for in respect of:

a. The Company initiated Arbitration proceedings against M/s. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd, Thailand (hereby known as Thaicom Public Company Limited) for various claims. However, the Arbitral Tribunal, without Notice, in a meeting for directions, held contrary to the express provisions of the Agreement between the parties, proceeded to disregard/set-aside claim of the Company for not appearing before the Tribunal in the said meeting and thereafter proceeded to pass ex-parte award against the company for US$ 10,16,603.78 (Rs.6,10,97,684), along with interest @18% p.a. from the date of award, merely considering the counter-claim of the defendants without considering any claims/submissions documents/evidence/Affidavits already filed by the Company. The award too contains many in-consistencies and the company has therefore filed appeal against the said order on various grounds before the Hon''ble High Court of Delhi. The Learned Single Judge vide his order dismissed the Petition filed by the Company on the ground that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Company filed an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, who, vide their order upheld the order of the Learned Single Judge on the ground that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements and thereby Courts in India will have no jurisdiction, without considering the fact that the issue as to the applicability of Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the present arbitration stood already decided by the designate of the Chief Justice of India while exercising His jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act,1996 passed in Arbitration Petition. Being aggrieved, the Company therefore filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon''ble Supreme Court of India, which was admitted. The said execution petition is pending for adjudication and as per the Supreme Court Order the company has given a bank Guarantee of Rs. 2,50,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore Fifty Lacs only). In the meanwhile, Thaicom Public Company Limited has filed an Execution Petition before the Hon''ble High Court of Judicature at Mumbai seeking execution of the Award. The said execution petition is also pending for adjudication.

b. The Commissioner of Service Tax Department had passed Order determining the Net service tax Liability of Rs. 51,26,745/- ( after credit for payments ) for the period from 16th June 2001 to 31st March 2006, which has been duly accounted by the Company . The Learned Commissioner had also passed Order for Recovery of Interest at the appropriate rate on the service Tax amount as determined and also imposed Penalty of Rs.1,02,55,493/-. As against this Order Management has filed an appeal with CESTAT, and the matter came up for hearing were in CESTAT has passed an order dt. 16th September 2013 asking company to deposit an amount of Rs. 49,65,873/- towards Service Tax Liability with in a period of 8 Weeks and the same was paid. As Regards pre deposit of Interest & Penalty the same is waived and recovery of the same is stayed for hearing of appeal.

c. Service Tax Department had issued Show cause cum Demand Notice for Rs. 11,95,884/- towards Short Payment of service tax for the period from 1st April 2007 to 31st March 2008. The demand was raised by the department for erroneous computation of taxable revenue, the company has submitted written explanation to that effect to the Department and rectification from the department is awaited.

3. Estimated amounts of capital contracts remaining to be executed (advance paid) Rs. Nil (Nil)

4. During the year or in previous year the company has not entered into any transaction relating to foreign currency.

5. Amount Due to Small, Medium and Micro enterprises: Company is in process of inviting information from its vendors for their status under "The Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Development Act 2006", however in absence of any information, no disclosures have been made in this regards.

6. Balances in Unsecured Loans and some of the Debtors, Creditors, Loans & Advance are subject to confirmation and reconciliation, if any.

7. In the Opinion of the Board, the current assets, Loans & Advances are approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course of the business.

8. Previous Yeas Figure have been regrouped to conform to the current year presentation.


Mar 31, 2013

1. The Company was fbOowing corporate accounting year to close the accounts on 31st March every year. During the currant year the Company has prepared the accounts tor Twelve months ended 31st March, 2013 However previous year''s figures for the Period ended on 31st March 2012. are not directly comparable as the accounts are prepared for Nine months, which have been regrouped and recasted wherever considered necessary

2. Contingent UabiHty not provided for in respect oft

1. The Company initiated Arbitration proceedings against M/s. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd, Thailand (hereby known as Thateom Public Company limited) for various claims. However, the Arbitral Tribunal, without Notice, in a meeting for directions, held contrary to the express provisions of the Agreement between the parties, proceeded to disregard/set-aside claim of the Company for not appearing before the Tribunal in the said meeting and thereafter proceeded to pass ex-parte award against the company for US$ 10,16,603.78 (Rs.5,52,92,368), along with interest @18% p.a. from the date of award, merely considering the counter-claim of the defendants without considering any claims/submissions documents/evidence/Affidavits already filed by the Company. The award too contains many in- consistencies and the company has therefore filed appeal against the said order on various grounds before the Horfble High Court of Delhi. The Learned Single Judge vide his order dtomissed the Petition filed by the Company on the ground that Part 1 ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Company filed an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, who, vide their order upheld the order of the Learned Single Judge on the ground that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements and thereby Courts in India will have no jurisdiction, without considering the fact that the issue as to the applicability of Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 1996 to the present arbitration stood already decided by the designate of the Chief Justice of India while exercising His jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation, AcL1996 passed in Arbitration Petition. Being aggrieved, the Company therefore filed a Special Leave Petition before the Horfble Supreme Court of India, which was admitted. The said execution petition is pending for adjudication and as per the Supreme Court Order the company has given a bank Guarantee of Rs. 2,50,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore Fifty Lacs only). In the meanwhile, Thateom Public Company Limited has filed an Execution Petition before the Horfble High Court of Judicature at Mumbai seeking execution of the Award. The said execution petition is also pending for adjudication.

2. 1 .The Commissioner of Service Tax Department had passed Order determining the Net service tax UabiBty of Rs. 51,26,745/- (after credit for payments) for the period from 16th June 2001 to 31st March 2006, which has been duly accounted by the Company. The Learned Commissioner had also passed Order for Recovery of Interest at the appropriate rate on the service Tax amount as determined and also imposed Penalty of Rs. 1,02,55,493/-. As against this Order Management has decided to file an appeal with CESAT.

3. Service Tax Department had issued Show cause cum Demand Notice for Rs. 11,95,8847- towards Short Payment of service tax for the period from 1st April 2007 to 31st March 2008. The demand was raised by the department for erroneous computation of taxable revenue, the company has submitted written explanation to that effect to the Department and rectification from the department is awaited.

4. Estimated amounts of capital contracts remaining to be executed (advance paid) Rs. Nil (Nil)

5. During the year or in previous year the company has not entered into any transaction relating to foreign currency. ''

6. In the Opinion of the Board, the current assets, Loans & Advances are approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course of the business.

7. Amount Due to Small, Medium and Micro enterprises:

Company is in process of inviting information from its vendors for their status under The Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Development Act 2006", however in absence of any information, no disclosures have been made in this regards.

8. Balances in Unsecured Loans and some of the Debtors, Creditors, Loans & Advance are subject to confirmation and reconciliation, if any.


Mar 31, 2012

1. The Company was following corporate accounting year to close the accounts on 31s1 March each year. During the current year the Company has prepared the accounts for 9 months period ended 31a March, 2012 . Accordingly previous year's figures, which have been regrouped and recasted wherever considered necessary, are not directly comparable with the last year accounts prepared for Fifteen months.

2. Contingent Liability not provided for in respect of:

1. The Company initiated Arbitration proceedings against M/s. Shin-Satellite Public Co. Ltd, Thailand (hereby known as Thaicom Public Company Limited) for various claims. However, the Arbitral Tribunal, without Notice, in a meeting for directions, held contrary to the express provisions of the Agreement between the parties, proceeded to disregard/set-aside claim of the Company for not appearing before the Tribunal in the said meeting and thereafter proceeded to pass ex-parte award against the company for US$ 10,16,603.78 (Rs.5,17,18,294), along with interest @18% p.a. from the date of award, merely considering the counter-claim of the defendants without considering any claims/submissions documents/evidence/Affidavits already filed by the Company. The award too contains many in- consistencies and the company has therefore filed appeal against the said order on various grounds before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The Learned Single Judge vide his order dismissed the Petition filed by the Company on the ground that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Company filed an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, who, vide their order upheld the order of the Learned Single Judge on the ground that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is excluded by the parties under agreements and thereby Courts in India will have no jurisdiction, without considering the fact that the issue as to the applicability of Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the present arbitration stood already decided by the designate of the Chief Justice of India while exercising His jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, 1996 passed in Arbitration Petition. Being aggrieved, the Company therefore filed a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, which is pending adjudication. In the meanwhile, Thaicom Public Company Limited has filed an Execution Petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Mumbai seeking execution of the Award. The said execution petition is also pending adjudication

3. Estimated amounts of capital contracts remaining to be executed (advance paid) Rs. Nil (Nil)

4. Additional information pursuant to provisions of Part IV of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 is annexed hereto and forming part of the Balance Sheet.

5. Amount Due to Small, Medium and Micro enterprises:

Company is in process of inviting information from its vendors for their status under "The Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Development Act 2006", however in absence of any information, no disclosures have been made in this regards.

6. Balances in Unsecured Loans and some of the Debtors, Creditors, Loans & Advance are subject to confirmation and reconciliation, if any.

7. In the Opinion of the Board, the current assets, Loans & Advances are approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course of the business.

I. Registration Details

Registration No. L67I20MH1981PLC025111

Balance Sheet Date 31st March 2012


Jun 30, 2011

1 The Company was following corporate accounting year to close the accounts on 31st March each year During the current year the Company has prepared the accounts for 15 months period ended 30th June, 2011 Accordingly previous year's figures, which have been regrouped and recasted wherever considered necessary, are not directly comparable

2. Contingent Liability not provided for in respect of:

1. The company Initiated Arbitration proceedings against M/s. Shin Satellite Public Co Ltd' Thailand for various claims. However, the Arbitral Tribunal, without Notice, in a meeting for directions, held contrary to the express provisions of the Agreement between the parties, proceeded to disregard / set-aside claim of the Company for not appearing before the Tribunal in the said meeting and thereafter, proceeded to pass ex-parte order against the company for US $ 10.16,603 78 [ Rs 4.54,62,531) , along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of award, merely considering the counter-claim of the defendants without considering any claims / submissions documents I evidence / Affidavits already filed by the Company The award too contains many tn-consistencies and the company has therefore filed appeal against the said order on various grounds which has been admitted by the Delhi High Court and the matter is therefore sub-judiee

3. Particulars 30.6.2011 31.3.2010

1 Service Tax Department has Issued Show Cause Notice to the 43,00,740 43,00,740 company for total dues of Rs 1,15,94,714 towards service tax up to 31st August 2004. As against which company has paid without prejudice/under protest Rs 72,93,974/- Management has contested for balance demand of Rs. 43,00.740/- and is confident of getting favourable decision in ihe matter

2 Company has not charged and not provided for service tax for 1,75,43,596 92.37,353 the period from September 2004 to 31st March 2006 on the Social and Religious programmes telecast on the channel and it has made representation to the Ministry of Finance and CBEC for relief from service tax on such programme on the ground that exemptions are applicable to other services provided to Spiritual/Religious organisations The Service tax department has issued show cause notice to the company for Total Dues of Rs. 1.75,43,596/- on the basis of balance - sheet. However the Management has contested the demand

3, Estimated amounts of capital contracts remaining Id be executed (advance paid) Rs. Nil (Nil)

4. Additional information pursuant to provisions of Pari IV of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 is annexed hereto and forming part of Ihe Balance Sheet,

5. Amount Due to Small, Medium and Micro enterprises:

Company is in process of inviting information from its vendors for their status under "The Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Development Act 2006", however in absence of any information, no disclosures have been made in this regards.

6. Balances in Unsecured Loans and some of the Debtors. Creditors, Loans & Advance are subject to confirmation and reconciliation, if any

7. In the Opinion of the Board, the current assets, Loans & Advances are approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course of the business


Mar 31, 2010

1. The Arbitration initiated by the company against M/s. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. is ongoing.

2. During the year :the company has sold international business of Aastha Television Channel for Rs. 2,50,00,000 and-a sum of Rs. 1,64,44,003/- treated as deferred expenses in earlier years related to international distribution amounting has been written off during the current year.

3. During the year the Company has written off following amounts:

a. Sundry Debtors - Rs.52,32,813/-

b. Advance - 5,54,200/-

4. Additional information pursuant to provisions of Part IV of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956 is annexed hereto and forming part of the Balance Sheet.

5. Previous year's figures have been regrouped / rearranged wherever considered necessary.

6. Figures in brackets indicate previous year figures.

7. Some of the Debit & Credit balances are subject to confirmation and subsequent reconciliation thereof.

8. In the Opinion of the Board, the current assets, Loans & Advances are approximately of the value stated, if realized in the ordinary course of the business.

న్యూస్ అప్ డేట్స్ వెంటనే పొందండి
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X